This has been driven by the availability, low cost, and reliability of modern mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, along with the requirement to improve the integrity and quality of data collected while limiting missing data entries and ensuring the timeliness of PROM completion.
DOES SAMSUNG J7 HAVE SMART SCROLL PRO
Īn increasing number of clinical research studies employ electronic formats to collect PRO measures (PROMs) in field-based and in-clinic settings. In the last two decades, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have progressively contributed to patient-focused drug development by requiring PRO endpoints in new drug applications and including data from PROMs in drug labelling. Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures have been increasingly gaining momentum in clinical outcome research because of recent movement toward patient-centeredness in both clinical practice and research. Further studies that assess scrolling impact over long-term, repeated use are recommended. The measurement properties of PROMs are preserved even in the presence of scrolling on a handheld device. Age, language, and device size produced insignificant differences in scores. The equivalence threshold was met for all but one SF-12 domain score (bodily pain lower 95% CI: 0.65) and two EQ-5D-5L item scores (pain/discomfort, usual activities lower 95% CI: 0.64/0.67). High associations between scrolling and non-scrolling were observed (ICCs: 0.71–0.96).
One hundred fifteen English- or Spanish-speaking participants (21-75y) completed all four administrations. Associations between ePROM scores were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), with lower bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) > 0.7 indicating comparability. Participants completed English or Spanish versions according to their first language. The ePROMs included were the SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, and three pain measures: a visual analogue scale, a numeric response scale and a Likert scale. MethodsĪdult participants with a chronic condition involving daily pain completed ePROMs on four devices with different scrolling properties: a large provisioned device not requiring scrolling two provisioned devices requiring scrolling – one with a “smart-scrolling” feature that disabled the “next” button until all information was viewed, and a second without this feature and BYOD with smart-scrolling. This study explored the impact of scrolling on the measurement equivalence of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in the presence and absence of scrolling. Scrolling is a perceived barrier in the use of bring your own device (BYOD) to capture electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs).
0 kommentar(er)
